Nano — under ~10k
Audiences that often know the creator personally. Highest engagement, smallest reach, cheapest to test.
Splitting a budget across ten well-matched micro creators nearly always outperforms spending it on one macro creator. The reason brands do not do it is not scepticism — it is that ten creators is ten times the operational work.
The commonly used ranges are rough but useful: nano creators below roughly ten thousand followers, micro from there to around a hundred thousand, mid-tier to around half a million, and macro above that. The boundaries vary by who is defining them and by platform.
What matters is the pattern underneath. Engagement rate falls as follower count rises, fairly reliably. A nano creator's audience often knows them personally; a macro creator's audience is a broadcast audience. Somewhere in the micro band you get the best available trade between reach and genuine influence, and that is where most Indian brand budgets should concentrate.
One macro creator is one creative execution, one audience, one posting slot, one set of conditions. If the angle is wrong, the entire budget is wrong, and you learn one thing.
Ten micro creators is ten executions across ten audience pockets. Some will underperform and some will considerably outperform, and the spread itself is information — which angle worked, which audience responded, which creator to build a retainer with. The portfolio is not just lower risk, it is a research instrument. A ₹40,000 budget across three tightly-matched micro creators routinely beats one mismatched celebrity post, and teaches you three times as much.
Ten creators means ten briefs, ten rate negotiations, ten contracts, ten shipping addresses, ten sets of deadlines, ten rounds of approvals and ten payment runs. For an in-house team of one or two, that is the reason micro strategies get abandoned after a first attempt.
This is the actual argument for an agency in this tier, and it is an operational one rather than a creative one. The matching finds the ten; the management makes running them sustainable. Both are described on the influencer marketing page.
There are cases. A launch that needs a single moment of mass awareness, a category where one creator has disproportionate authority, a brand-building exercise where the association itself is the point — these are real, and a portfolio of micro creators will not replicate them.
The honest position is that most Indian D2C and local brands are not in those cases, and buy macro because it feels safer or because it is easier to explain internally. We will tell you which situation you are in rather than defaulting to whichever is easier to sell.
(01) — Formats
A short list of things that work, rather than a long list nobody is watching.
Audiences that often know the creator personally. Highest engagement, smallest reach, cheapest to test.
The best available trade between reach and genuine influence. Where most Indian budgets should sit.
Useful for scaling an angle that has already proven itself in the micro band.
For single moments of mass awareness or genuine category authority. Rarely the efficient default.
(02) — FAQ
Roughly ten thousand to a hundred thousand followers, though the boundaries vary by who is defining them and by platform. Below that is usually called nano, above it mid-tier and then macro. The useful pattern behind the labels is that engagement rate falls fairly reliably as follower count rises, which is why the micro band tends to offer the best trade between reach and genuine influence.
One macro creator is a single execution against a single audience — if the angle is wrong, the whole budget is wrong and you learn one thing. Ten micro creators is ten executions across ten audience pockets, and the spread of results tells you which angle worked, which audience responded and who is worth a retainer. It is lower risk and it is also a research instrument.
Because ten creators means ten briefs, ten negotiations, ten contracts, ten shipping addresses, ten deadline chases and ten payment runs. For a small in-house team that operational load is what kills micro strategies after the first attempt. It is the main practical argument for using an agency in this tier, and it is an operational argument rather than a creative one.
Proportionally yes, because buying followers is cheapest at small scale and engagement pods are widespread. It matters more here than anywhere, since the entire case for micro rests on genuine audience relationships — if the reach is not real, the economics collapse completely. Every profile in our network is audited on audience authenticity and engagement patterns before it reaches a shortlist.
When you need a single moment of mass awareness, when one creator holds disproportionate authority in your category, or when the association itself is the point of the campaign. Those cases are real. Most Indian D2C and local brands are not in them, and buy macro because it feels safer or is easier to justify internally — we will tell you which situation you are actually in.
(03) — Also from Sanero
(04) — Contact
Brand or creator — send a brief and the matching starts today.