One line of identity
Niche, city, languages. More useful to a brand than any amount of personality copy.
A media kit is not a portfolio and it is not a brand book. It is a document that lets someone decide, in under a minute, whether to put you on a shortlist. Most creator media kits fail because they are designed to impress rather than to be read quickly.
Want the kit, not the theory? The free media kit generator builds a one-page kit from your numbers in two minutes and prints it to PDF. The rest of this page is what to put in it and why.
Your media kit is usually opened by someone comparing you against ten other creators for the same brief, with the brand waiting on a shortlist. They are skimming for three things: who watches you, whether the numbers look real, and what working with you costs.
Anything that does not help answer those three questions is making the document worse, not better. That includes your logo, your design flourishes, your life story and your mood board. Save those for the pitch; the kit needs to survive a forty-second skim.
Who you are, in one line. Niche, city, languages. "Fitness and nutrition, Mumbai, Hindi and English" tells a brand more than a paragraph of personality.
Audience data. Age split, gender split, top cities, top countries. This is the section brands read most carefully and the one most creators skip. Screenshot it directly from your platform analytics — brands trust screenshots more than typed numbers, for obvious reasons.
Honest performance averages. Average views, average likes and comments, engagement rate, across your last ten to fifteen posts. Not your best post. Anyone experienced can tell when a number is a peak rather than an average, and it damages your credibility on everything else in the document.
Three examples of past brand work, with what the campaign was and how it performed. If you have none yet, use your three strongest organic posts and say so.
What you offer and how to reach you. Deliverable formats you produce, and an email that you actually check.
Whether to put rates in a media kit is a genuine judgement call. Including them filters out brands who were never going to pay, which saves everyone time. Leaving them out preserves flexibility to price against scope — which matters, because the same deliverable is worth very different amounts depending on usage rights and exclusivity.
Our suggestion: include a starting-from figure, not a fixed card. "Reels from ₹—, final quote depends on usage rights and exclusivity" signals that you are professional, filters the time-wasters, and leaves the actual pricing conversation properly open. The reasoning behind that is on what to charge.
Update every quarter, or immediately after anything that materially changes your numbers. A kit that says 40,000 followers when you have 70,000 undersells you; one that says 70,000 when you have 40,000 ends the relationship the moment anybody checks.
A plain, well-organised, honest one-pager beats a beautiful one that hides the numbers. The people reading it do this all day and they are grateful for documents that respect their time.
If you are working through a matched network, your profile does the media kit's job — and does it better, because it is structured data that can be searched rather than a PDF somebody has to open.
When you join our network you fill in the same information once, and it gets matched against every relevant brief afterwards. A media kit remains worth having for direct brand conversations, but it stops being the thing standing between you and deal flow.
(01) — The essentials
The parts worth getting right before anything else.
Niche, city, languages. More useful to a brand than any amount of personality copy.
Age, gender, cities, countries — screenshotted from analytics. The section brands read hardest.
Last ten to fifteen posts, not your best one. Experienced readers spot a peak instantly.
Filters brands who were never going to pay, without locking your pricing before scope is known.
(02) — FAQ
Five things, in this order: who you are in one line covering niche, city and languages; audience demographics screenshotted from your analytics; honest performance averages across your last ten to fifteen posts; three examples of past work; and what you offer plus a monitored email. Anything that does not help a brand decide who watches you, whether the numbers are real and what you cost is making the document worse.
A starting-from figure rather than a fixed card is usually the right balance. It filters out brands who were never going to pay, signals that you are professional, and still leaves room to price properly against usage rights and exclusivity — which is where the real difference in a quote comes from.
One page, readable in under a minute. It is usually opened by someone comparing you against ten other creators with a brand waiting on a shortlist. If it takes them a minute to find your engagement rate, you are already off the list.
Every quarter, or immediately after anything that materially changes your numbers. A stale kit either undersells you or, worse, overstates you — and overstating ends the relationship the moment anyone checks the live profile.
For direct brand conversations, yes. For deal flow through the network, no — your profile does the same job better, because it is structured data that can be searched against every incoming brief rather than a PDF somebody has to open and read.
(03) — More for creators
(04) — Contact
Free to join, no follower minimum for UGC work, and every deal through us pays.